Jesus Is Lord, the U.S. Government Is Not

“Jesus is Lord, and Caesar is not.” This quote from N. T. Wright (among others) reflects what he sees as¬†a major subversive political message throughout the Gospels and the New Testament in its entirety. The fact that Jesus Christ rose from the dead despite the agreement of Jewish and Roman political leaders to kill Him means that the authorities of this world have no real power.¬†The greatest power of tyrants¬†is death, and Jesus undid¬†death. This reality of resurrection is a threat to all world powers. Christ’s people are therefore free to live¬†as citizens of the kingdom to come and not the kingdoms of this world.

Of course, this sounds rather irrelevant to modern life for the most part, at least in the Western world and America. We don’t live in a dictatorship, or an absolute monarchy, or a police state, or¬†any recognizable kind of political tyranny.¬†Instead we pride ourselves on being a free country. So the significance of “Jesus is Lord, [insert political power¬†here] is not” can be lost on us.¬†

But at the same time, there is something slightly subversive even now in saying, “My¬†allegiance is to Jesus Christ, not the United States of America.¬†My country is from above, and¬†in this nation¬†I live as a foreigner. The President, Congress, and the courts can say what they like, but if I obey¬†them it is to better serve Christ, and not for their sake.” After all, we look to the government to affirm right and wrong, do something about our national problems, and maintain order¬†among the people. So a statement like this grounded in Jesus risen Lordship can’t help but¬†strike¬†lots of people as at least a bit rebellious and dangerous.

But what brings me to this topic? I know this will get me a facepalm from my more¬†liberal friends (both politically and theologically), but it’s of course about a certain Supreme Court case. Unless you’ve been living under a rock lately, you probably know that¬†Obergefell v. Hodges is set to determine the future of gay marriage in all 50 states. And unless you’ve been living under a rock for 50 years, you¬†can probably guess how this will turn out. Given¬†the status of public opinion on¬†gay marriage, and the spirit of the age, it seems¬†likely enough that this case will result in the determination of a “Constitutional right” to gay marriage in¬†the entire nation.

Obviously, the mere existence of gay marriage won’t hurt me or¬†others who oppose¬†it, but the real issue comes in the affect unanimous government approval of gay marriage would have on churches and Christian schools. As it stands, most churches can choose to only hire straight pastors and other staff members and to only marry straight couples. Generally,¬†Christian schools are not obligated to hire gay teachers or enroll students in¬†gay marriages. We have moral standards based on traditionally solid readings of the Holy Scriptures, and we can for the most part honor those beliefs in how we run schools and churches.

This¬†may very well not continue following the Supreme Court’s ruling.¬†If you’ve paid attention to the news lately, you may have seen the comment by Solicitor General Donald Verrili in the case arguments.¬†Chief Justice John G. Roberts asked him about the tax exempt status of religious¬†schools who oppose gay marriage. Bob Jones University was previously stripped of their tax exempt status for banning interracial relationships, and the Chief Justice asked if the same would happen to¬†places with policies against homosexuality. The response:

You know, I‚ÄĒI don‚Äôt think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it‚Äôs certainly going to be an issue. I‚ÄĒI don‚Äôt deny that. I don‚Äôt deny that, Justice Alito. It is‚ÄĒit is going to be an issue.

So we have from the mouth of¬†an important political official that there will be some kind of problem with the ability of¬†Christian colleges to oppose gay marriage if the ruling enforces its recognition. That is dangerous to Christians, since here we have the legitimate possibility of the government wielding taxation as a weapon to make believers conform to the mindset of the world at large. If this happens, it will be the declaration, “We are Lord, your Jesus is not.”

This problem can also be seen in the statements¬†of various politicians around the nation. Most recently¬†Hillary Clinton comes to mind. Here’s what she said about abortion “rights”:

Far too many women are still denied critical access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth. All the laws we‚Äôve passed don‚Äôt count for much if they‚Äôre not enforced…Rights have to exist in practice ‚ÄĒ not just on paper…Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.

There’s no trick or quote mining here. Hillary’s record on these¬†matters speaks for itself. For Hillary Clinton, one of the foremost¬†representatives of the Democratic Party and half the country,¬†religious convictions are an obstacle to be overcome so that people can have abortions. Disagreement cannot be tolerated. The law must spite religious belief and move the people towards liberalism’s goals.¬†

Unfortunately, beliefs like these are all to common and seem to be the trajectory of the government. Soon Christian schools and churches are likely to be faced with a choice: obey Christ or country.¬†Let your judge be God or government. And of course if you¬†choose to believe that Jesus is Lord and Caesar¬†is not, there will be consequences. They’ll likely start out purely within the economic sphere (taxes and fines), but do not be surprised if they move on from there. Christian schools could potentially lose accreditation. Churches could lose their buildings. And there’s always the possibility of more “hate speech” laws leading to jail time for Christian pastors, professors, and bloggers.

Of course,¬†I’m not here simply to scare anyone or complain about the victories of some conspiratorial liberal elite. I’m simply making the point that our government is reaching a point where it considers itself the “father” of church. Religions are like rambunctious children who must be corrected and disciplined so that they will do what their parents want.¬†The state is to keep the church¬†in line, not the other way around. This is dangerous and points ever so subtly towards an innocent-looking, nearly accepted¬†totalitarianism.¬†

We know, however, that Jesus is Lord and the U.S. government is not. Whatever they say, we must continue to follow Christ. For we don’t obey the laws of this world for their own sake, as though they had any real authority. We obey them for the¬†Gospel, so that by submitting to the¬†institutions God has¬†given power for the sake of maintaining order we may live quiet, respectful, and peaceful lives which¬†witness to God’s amazing grace in Jesus Christ.

This means that when it comes down to it on issues like abortion and gay marriage, or anything else which comes up, we will not waver but follow the faith we have received. We trust that whatever the fallout, we will be vindicated and restored by our Father, if not in this life then in the resurrection. But this also means that we should not go out of our way to cause trouble. While we should stand our ground, we should avoid being feisty, aggressive, or rebellious. These are not Christian virtues and will only unnecessarily hinder our respectable witness. 

I suppose I’ve rambled a bit, so here’s my main point: the¬†U.S. government is coming to a place where it thinks it can control the Christian religion. But it cannot. Whatever authority it presumes to have is undermined by the victory of Jesus. So if they try to oppose us in whatever ways, we¬†are¬†already on the winning side. Because of Christ, we¬†need not fear or get feisty, but can be bold, brave, and also respectably self-controlled.¬†For Jesus is Lord, and the U.S. government is not.

I'm 22. I'm married with a toddler and a newborn. love Jesus Christ. I grew up a Southern Baptist and now situate myself within Evangelical Calvinism (which isn't TULIP!). I also draw substantially from N. T. Wright, Peter Leithart, and Alastair Roberts. I go to the Baptist College of Florida. I'm also a bit nerdy.